Impact evaluation
Measure what changed and why.
We help define outcomes, comparison strategies, timing, indicators, and the limits of the evaluation design.
Outcome design
Comparison logic
Evaluation framework
APPLIED ECONOMICS / IMPACT
Use data to understand markets, people, programs, and policy. We help teams move from an impact question to credible evidence and a decision they can defend.
01 / WHEN IMPACT IS HARD TO MEASURE
A change is not automatically an impact.
Applied questions come with constraints: imperfect data, real-world timing, comparison groups, competing explanations, and stakeholders who need a clear answer. We help make those trade-offs explicit.
You need to understand whether a program, policy, or intervention made a difference.
You have market or demographic data but need a defensible analytical frame.
You need evidence that works for funders, leadership, policy teams, or the public.
02 / WHAT WE SUPPORT
We support practical economic analysis without losing sight of identification, assumptions, and the decision the evidence needs to inform.
Impact evaluation
We help define outcomes, comparison strategies, timing, indicators, and the limits of the evaluation design.
Causal inference
Where supported by the design and data, we explore credible approaches to estimate relationships and treatment effects.
Market + demographic analysis
We turn demographic, survey, market, and administrative data into evidence for strategy, targeting, and resource decisions.
Economic modeling + reporting
We connect technical results to scenarios, trade-offs, costs, benefits, and the decision audience.
03 / THE WORKFLOW
A useful engagement gives you more than a file. It gives you a clearer sequence from question to evidence to action.
Clarify the baseline, mechanism, population, and decision.
Use a design and method that fit the evidence available.
Translate the result into a practical option or recommendation.
04 / HOW WE WORK
You stay close to the thinking, understand the trade-offs, and finish with work you can stand behind.
Define the decision and theory of change.
Audit data, comparison logic, and assumptions.
Estimate, test, and explain the evidence.
Deliver recommendations with limits visible.
05 / A GOOD FIT IF YOU ARE
Looking for a practical partner, not a black box.
StatisticsEco combines statistical depth with practical communication across academic, industry, and public-sector questions.
A public-sector team evaluating a program or policy.
A nonprofit or funder assessing outcomes and value.
A business team studying markets, customers, or demand.
A researcher developing an applied economics paper or report.
LET’S MAKE THE NEXT STEP CLEARER
Tell us what you are working on. We will come back with a practical view of what is possible, what is needed, and where to start.
06 / COMMON QUESTIONS
Still deciding if we are the right fit? Ask us directly — or find a quick answer below.
Yes. We can start with the program logic, available outcomes, timing, comparison information, and decision the evaluation needs to support.
Where the design and data permit, we can discuss approaches such as difference-in-differences, matching logic, or other quasi-experimental strategies.
Yes. The first step is understanding data structure, population, timing, measurement, and the intended economic or policy question.
Where included in scope, we can provide technical analysis alongside a concise report, policy brief, dashboard-ready tables, or executive presentation.
A short description of the program, market, policy, data sources, outcomes, and decision timeline is enough for a useful first discussion.